A) BINDING LAW
Hard penalties for non-compliance
EU AI Act
📋 1. WHAT IS MANDATED
High-risk AI systems must maintain complete documentation of training, data sources, and model changes. Organizations must demonstrate traceability for all lifecycle events. Post-market monitoring and incident reporting are mandatory.
⚠️ 2. WHAT FAILS IF IGNORED
Non-compliance triggers fines up to €35M or 7% of global annual revenue. Certification suspension. Product recall orders. Criminal liability for executives in severe cases.
💼 3. PROCUREMENT & SALES IMPACT
Market access restrictions. Procurement requirements. Contract compliance clauses.
⚖️ 4. RISK & LIABILITY
Regulatory fines. Civil lawsuits from affected parties. Product liability claims. Criminal prosecution for deliberate non-compliance. Market access bans.
✓ 5. HOW COMAC ALIGNS
Comac provides immutable, time-anchored records of all lifecycle events. Cryptographic lineage chains prove training history. Verification records serve as compliance evidence. Public verification endpoints enable independent audit.
Takeaway: EU AI Act makes provenance documentation legally mandatory. Comac provides the evidence trail regulators require.
B) DE FACTO ENFORCEMENT
Procurement and contract power
NIST AI Risk Management Framework
📋 1. WHAT IS MANDATED
Organizations must map AI system lifecycle, identify risks at each stage, and maintain governance documentation. Trustworthiness characteristics must be verifiable.
⚠️ 2. WHAT FAILS IF IGNORED
Enterprise RFP rejection. Loss of government contracts. Insurance denial. Due diligence failure. Vendor disqualification from major deals.
💼 3. PROCUREMENT & SALES IMPACT
Procurement requirements. Contract compliance. Competitive positioning.
⚖️ 4. RISK & LIABILITY
Contract breach claims. Lost revenue from blocked deals. Reputational damage. Competitive disadvantage. Exclusion from enterprise vendor programs.
✓ 5. HOW COMAC ALIGNS
Comac's lifecycle timeline provides complete system mapping. Risk classification (LOW/HIGH/CRITICAL) aligns with NIST risk categorization. Immutable records support governance audits.
Takeaway: NIST alignment is becoming a prerequisite for enterprise AI procurement. Comac proves governance capability.
Enterprise Procurement AI Policies
📋 1. WHAT IS MANDATED
Large enterprises increasingly mandate provenance documentation, lifecycle tracking, and third-party verification before approving AI systems for use.
⚠️ 2. WHAT FAILS IF IGNORED
Immediate procurement block. Vendor blacklisting. Contract termination. Legal department rejection. Security team veto.
💼 3. PROCUREMENT & SALES IMPACT
Procurement blocks. Contract requirements. Vendor selection criteria.
⚖️ 4. RISK & LIABILITY
Lost enterprise deals. Contract breach penalties. Exclusion from vendor programs. Legal action for misrepresentation. Reputational damage in B2B markets.
✓ 5. HOW COMAC ALIGNS
Comac provides the provenance and verification evidence that enterprise procurement teams require. Public verification URLs enable independent review without vendor access.
Takeaway: Enterprise buyers demand proof. Comac provides audit-ready evidence that unlocks procurement approval.
C) AUDIT & CERTIFICATION STANDARDS
Independent verification frameworks
ISO/IEC 42001 (AI Management Systems)
📋 1. WHAT IS MANDATED
Organizations must establish AI management systems with documented processes, risk controls, and continuous monitoring. Audit trails must demonstrate compliance.
⚠️ 2. WHAT FAILS IF IGNORED
Certification denial. Audit failure. Loss of existing certifications. Competitive disadvantage. Exclusion from certified vendor lists.
💼 3. PROCUREMENT & SALES IMPACT
Certification requirements. Procurement preferences. Competitive positioning.
⚖️ 4. RISK & LIABILITY
Certification costs without approval. Lost certification fees. Market access restrictions. Contract terms requiring ISO certification.
✓ 5. HOW COMAC ALIGNS
Comac's immutable audit trail supports ISO 42001 audits. Lifecycle documentation provides required evidence. Verification records demonstrate risk management.
Takeaway: ISO 42001 requires auditable AI governance. Comac provides the audit trail auditors examine.
D) SECTOR-SPECIFIC REGULATORS
High urgency compliance requirements
Healthcare: FDA / SaMD Expectations
📋 1. WHAT IS MANDATED
Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) must demonstrate design history, validation evidence, and change control. Post-market surveillance requires complete lifecycle tracking.
⚠️ 2. WHAT FAILS IF IGNORED
FDA approval denial. Product recall orders. Warning letters. Civil monetary penalties. Criminal prosecution for false claims. Market withdrawal.
💼 3. PROCUREMENT & SALES IMPACT
Market access restrictions. Approval requirements. Enforcement actions.
⚖️ 4. RISK & LIABILITY
FDA enforcement actions ($1M+ fines). Product liability lawsuits. Medical malpractice claims. Criminal charges. Class action litigation. Insurance denial.
✓ 5. HOW COMAC ALIGNS
Comac's immutable lifecycle timeline provides design history documentation. Hash-chained lineage proves change control. Verification records support validation evidence.
Takeaway: Healthcare regulators require complete design history. Comac provides the immutable evidence trail FDA examines.
Finance: SEC / FINRA / Model Risk Management
📋 1. WHAT IS MANDATED
Financial institutions must maintain model risk management frameworks with documentation, validation, and change control. Models used in trading, credit, or risk decisions require complete lineage.
⚠️ 2. WHAT FAILS IF IGNORED
Regulatory enforcement actions. Consent orders. Trading restrictions. Model disapproval. Capital adequacy penalties. License suspension.
💼 3. PROCUREMENT & SALES IMPACT
Regulatory enforcement. Market access restrictions. Compliance requirements.
⚖️ 4. RISK & LIABILITY
SEC/FINRA fines (millions). Regulatory consent orders. Trading losses from model failures. Shareholder lawsuits. Regulatory supervision requirements.
✓ 5. HOW COMAC ALIGNS
Comac provides the lineage documentation that model risk management frameworks require. Cryptographic proofs demonstrate model integrity. Verification records support regulatory examinations.
Takeaway: Financial regulators demand model lineage. Comac provides the evidence trail that examiners review.
E) INSURANCE & LIABILITY PRESSURE
Emerging but powerful enforcement
AI Underwriting Requirements
📋 1. WHAT IS MANDATED
Insurers increasingly require auditable AI governance, provenance documentation, and risk management evidence before issuing AI liability policies or product liability coverage.
⚠️ 2. WHAT FAILS IF IGNORED
Insurance denial. Uninsurable AI products. Higher premiums. Policy exclusions. Coverage denial for incidents.
💼 3. PROCUREMENT & SALES IMPACT
Insurance requirements. Underwriting criteria. Market access barriers.
⚖️ 4. RISK & LIABILITY
Uninsured liability exposure. Self-insurance requirements. Higher capital reserves. Product launch delays. Customer contract requirements for insurance.
✓ 5. HOW COMAC ALIGNS
Comac's audit-ready records demonstrate governance maturity. Immutable provenance provides underwriting evidence. Verification records signal risk management capability.
Takeaway: Insurers need auditability to price risk. Comac provides the governance evidence that enables coverage.
Note: This registry does not provide compliance certification or regulatory approval. Organizations are responsible for ensuring their use of the registry meets applicable regulatory requirements.